| Assignment : NRSG615-U3IP- Task 2_Meaningful Use |
| Level of Achievement |
Exemplary – exceeds expectations |
Proficient – meets expectations |
Fair – needs improvement |
Poor – does not meet expectations |
Score: |
| Total points possible: |
175 |
90-100% |
80-89% |
73-79% |
72 or less% |
| Criteria |
percent of score |
| Provide an introduction to include where you believe nursing informatics will be in five years supported by experiences from your practice background. (Max 35 points) |
20% |
Introduction clearly describes the student’s beliefs regarding informatics within the next five years supported by background experiences. (31-35 points) |
Is lacking clarity in describing beliefs on the future of informatics within the next five years yet is supported by background experiences. (28-30 points) |
Is lacking clarity in describing beliefs on the future of informatics within the next five years and does not support these thoughts using background experiences. (25-27 points) |
Does not describe beliefs on the future of informatics and does not include support thoughts from background experiences. (24 or less points) |
| Identify the main tenets of Meaningful Use Guidelines affecting electronic documentation processes in your practice setting. (Max 35 points) |
20% |
Clearly describes how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting, including at least two peer reviewed resources within the last 5 years as evidence to support this description. (31-35 points) |
Discusses Meaningful Use yet lacking the detail to reflect how the guidelines affect electronic documentation processes in your practice setting. (28-30 points) |
Minimal discussion of Meaningful Use and how the guidelines affect electronic documentation in your practice setting. (25-27 points) |
Does not discuss how Meaningful Use Guidelines affect electronic documentation in your practice setting. (24 or less points) |
| Describe how Meaningful Use is taking place in your practice setting (current phase). Include at least two resources as evidence to support your statements. (Must be from a peer reviewed reference published within the last five years). (Max 78.75 points) |
45% |
Clearly describes how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting, including at least two peer reviewed resources within the last 5 years as evidence to support this description. (70-78.75 points) |
Description of how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting is lacking structure and clarity, yet two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years were included to support the description. (63-69 points) |
Description of how Meaningful Use is being applied to your practice setting is acceptable, yet two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years are not included to support the discussion. (57-62 points) |
Presents neither a description of Meaningful Use application to your practice setting nor are two peer reviewed references within the last 5 years are included. (56 or less points) |
| Spelling, Grammar, APA format; 3-5 pages, not including title page and reference page. (Max 26.25 points) |
15% |
No spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 2 errors in APA formatting. (23-26.25 points) |
1-2 spelling or grammatical errors. Less than 4 errors in APA formatting. (21-22 points) |
4-5 spelling or grammatical errors. 4-6 errors in APA formatting. (19-20 points) |
More than 5 spelling or grammatical errors. More than 6 errors in APA formatting. (18 or less points) |
| 100% |
Total score: |
0 |
