PC 3.1

You presented the content in an incoherent way. Papers have frequent technical errors. Paper is disorganized. Lack of . .

You organise content in a manner that can be difficult for the reader to follow at times. Several technical, grammatical, and referencing errors throughout.

You organise content clearly but make some technical, referencing, format, grammatical and/or spelling errors.

. Generally appropriate referencing. Format mostly followed. Paper is mostly free of grammar and spelling errors.

You organise content clearly, with no (any) technical errors. Extensive referencing using correct APA format. Follows the suggested format and . Free of grammar and spelling errors.

KS 1.2

Does not show any understanding of importance of the topic, e.g., Textbook repetition. Majority of the operative components was not aligned. Majority of the assignment was incomplete, or incorrectly addressed. Word limit exceeded.

Shows a general awareness of importance of topic. Weak alignment of operative components. The assignment was attempted with one or more aspect incomplete or incorrectly addressed.

Shows a reasonably sound awareness of importance of the topic. Partially aligned operative components. Each aspect of the assignment was covered to a level of completeness that significantly supports the assignment.

Uses information well to illustrate knowledge of importance of the topic. Supportive argument. Fully aligned operative components. Each aspect of the assignment was complete and correctly addressed.

Gives a clear and concise explanation of all applicable topics in detail as well as showing additional related insight. Completely aligned operative components. Each aspect of the assignment was complete, comprehensive, and correctly addressed.

HO 2.2

You presented a few viable recommendations. You have not referred to sufficient (any) literature sources. Word limit exceeded.

You presented a few plausible recommendations, supported by literature. Recommendations are realistic. Some lack justification.

You present a list of recommendations. You refer to some . Your recommendations are realistic but could be supported further.

You evaluated and presented a detailed list of recommendations. You refer to several high-level high-quality literature sources. Your recommendations are plausible and realistic. Recommendations are justified with regards to the literature.

You evaluated and presented a detailed, strong, and comprehensive body of recommendations, showing an elevated level of originality. You refer to multiple high-level high-quality literature sources. Your recommendations are plausible, realistic, and fully justified.