Cancel Culture A Generation of Non tolerance

Ethics Argument Essay Topic
For this assignment, you are required to submit your argument paper topic with a very short introduction that gives an idea about the position you are taking on the chosen topic. In other words, it is not enough to just have a topic, it is more important to provide your thesis statement (that states who is your ethical position on the topic at hand). Keep in mind that ethics essays address issues related to morality, such as aspects of right and wrong (Actions) or good and bad (people). A sample structure is provided here to help you as you write your paper. For this assignment, you are limiting yourself only to points A and C in the introduction shown in the outline/structure below. Point B will be developed later.

Writing Outline and Structure of your Ethical Argument Paper/Essay
Like any other essay, your paper should follow a structure that underscores its outline. To write a good paper here are some tips followed by s sample outline and structure, and a Sample (Short paper on Euthanasia):
First, keep in mind that you are writing an argument paper. In an argument paper, you are not present a simple review of an ethical dilemma; rather you are presenting a written debate where you take a position on an issue and argue against other positions.
Choose a moral issue/topic you are passionate about. I would suggest you pick a debatable moral issue. Ideally, this should be a subject that can be discussed from opposing perspectives. When choosing a topic, try to focus on the ethical issues that concern modern society the most. According to statistics, the vast majority of readers appeal to emotions, so it would be a great idea to write on the challenging moral issues that humans face daily. Also, try to focus on issues or topics that evoke different opinions on the matter. This way, you will be able to provide the arguments and counterarguments concerning the issue. Remember to research to make sure there is enough supporting evidence.
Create a question-based title. One suggestion is to pose a question in the title of your ethical paper. As an alternative, you can include a question in the introduction. One way or another, it should be thought-provoking to draw the reader’s attention. For instance, you may want to ask an audience whether mandatory vaccination during a pandemic is morally right.
Present a Strong Argument: This step involves developing a compelling thesis statement that will make the readers agree with your argument. Excite your reader with a provocative thesis. Make sure to build a claim based on the query in a title or the opening line. For example, you may write that mandatory vaccination, even during a pandemic, is morally wrong.
Craft an outline. Develop the . A good outline serves as a ground plan for your writing. A well-drafted structure will help you stay on track. Write down all critical points to fully cover information related to the chosen topic.
Introduction: Introduce a topic briefly and concisely in the introduction section. Include the thesis statement.
Body of the essay: Introduce and defend arguments. This step is where you include all findings of research to demonstrate your reasoning. Each argument should be backed up or supported by scholarly sources . Populate your writing with supporting evidence (in-text citations) followed by an explanation of how your statement. Where applicable, introduce a counter argument and discuss why you refute it. Don’t forget to cite the sources to build up credibility.)
Conclusion: Restate a thesis statement in the conclusion section, including a summary of the main points (arguments that defend the papers thesis).

Here is the outline and structure to follow for your argumentative essay:
I. Introduction
A. Hook sentence. (Thought provoking question or statement that draws the attention the readers attention)
B. Background information on an ethical dilemma (discusses how the issue is a challenge to society)
C. Writers claim a thesis statement.
(This the focal point of your paper. In one sentence, what is your paper about. The thesis statement is the stand you are taking on the issue: Whatever the issue, is it morally right or wrong to do it? Take a side on the issue. This is what you will defending in the Body Paragraph. Do not stay neutral do not use it depends. Take a position here)

II. Body Paragraphs
Argument
(Here, you start presenting the different reasons why you think the issue is morally right or morally wrong. In this section, you are presenting the supporting evidence for the side you took)
state a position of an argument;
support this position with evidence;
explain how this evidence is right toward this argument and evidence;
conclude why this argument is valid.
Counterargument
(Here, you start presenting the views of those who will disagree with your stand)
provide a counterargument to a position in the first body paragraph;
include evidence that supports this counterargument, being opposite to an argument in the previous section;
explain how this counterargument and evidence in this paragraph are correct by using an opposite perspective;
finish why this counterargument is valid for this case.
Rebuttal
(Here, you provide additional reasons why your position is the right or the stronger one and why the opposing view is wrong or maybe weak)
Define the weaknesses of a counterargument.
Cover credible evidence that supports such weaknesses;
Write how these weaknesses make a counterargument irrelevant;
End with a statement that explains why a counterargument is not valid compared to an argument.
III. Conclusion
Restate a thesis.
B. Sum up on the argument, counterargument, and rebuttal.
C. State a final claim.

Example of an Ethics Argument Paper
Topic Is Euthanasia Ethical?
Sample Introduction
Terminal illness is a condition of profound pain and suffering for those affected, including the patients and their families (Hook Sentence). Today, some scientists support euthanasia, the aspect of assisting terminally ill patients in ending their lives (background info. Need more of course). While health professionals should do everything to help their patients to avoid suffering, assisting them in ending their lives is unethical and immoral. (Thesis statement. It can be placed somewhere else in this introduction)
II. Examples of Body Paragraphs
A. Argument
Life is a sacred thing, and no human being has any justification for ending it, regardless of whose it is. For example, the premise of a debate about euthanasia, which refers to assisted suicide, is the prevalence of terminal illnesses that subject individuals to a life of pain, suffering, and dependence. Without any hope of recovery, some individuals have opted to end their lives through the help of their loved ones or health professionals. While there is every reason to empathize with these individuals fate, there is no basis for supporting their desire to end their lives. In turn, the sanctity of life does not allow human beings to end life, no matter the circumstances.
B. Counterargument
If there seems to be no hope of recovery, ending life is counterproductive in an age of significant scientific and technological advancements. Basically, scientists are working round the clock to find cures to incurable diseases that have proven to be a threat to humanity. For example, today, smallpox is no longer a threat because a cure is found (Persson, 2010). Therefore, the fact that there may be no cure for a disease today does not mean that there will not be a cure tomorrow. Naturally, on hope to overcome moments of darkness, such as a terminal illness diagnosis. Nonetheless, it is the effort of the scientific community that has always bring hope to humanity. In this light, there is no ethical or moral justification for euthanasia.
C. Rebuttal
Euthanasia is not only a solution to terminal illness but also a sign of hopelessness and despair. When patients take the root of assisted suicide, it means that they give up on looking for alternatives in dealing with a problem. In this case, the fact that a terminal illness does not have a cure does not imply that it cannot be managed. Moreover, individuals who love a , such as family members and friends, hope to spend more time with them before an inevitable time happens. As such, terminally ill patients should use their families and health professionals to live longer. In essence, this aspect reflects true humanity standing firm and determining amid of insurmountable odds. On that truth alone, euthanasia is an idea that deserves no thought or attention.
III. Conclusion Sample of an Ethics Paper
There is nothing more devastating than a terminal illness diagnosis. Basically, such news punctures the hope of many individuals, families, and communities. Nonetheless, patients should not lose hope and despair to the point of wanting to end their lives because of being diagnosed with a terminal illness. Because life is sacred and there is always a higher probability of medical breakthroughs in an age of scientific and technological advancement, euthanasia is an unethical and immoral solution to a terminal illness.

Reference
Persson, S. (2010).Smallpox, syphilis, and salvation: Medical breakthroughs that changed theworld. East Gosford, : Exisle Publishing.